Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • #REDIRECT [[:Category:Spec_Remarks]]
    36 bytes (4 words) - 17:51, 10 October 2019
  • #REDIRECT [[:Category:Spec_Remarks]]
    36 bytes (4 words) - 17:52, 10 October 2019
  • === Specification front === * Specs in last call
    383 bytes (50 words) - 11:03, 7 November 2008
  • {{specs}}
    208 bytes (35 words) - 20:10, 20 April 2020
  • [[Category:Spec_Remarks]]
    359 bytes (45 words) - 15:40, 10 October 2019
  • {{specs}} ...popular method is to have users contact administrators, or some deployment-specific solution.
    330 bytes (49 words) - 20:51, 17 April 2020
  • ...client and server side. I also have an important understanding of the XMPP specs since I had to "study" them to correctly implement our server and client s ...he knowledge and experience I gained after implementing many JEPs and XMPP specs both on the server and client sides.
    1 KB (200 words) - 21:48, 24 July 2010
  • ...cretary, Treasurer, Executive Director, etc. I also [co-]authored a lot of specs, both XEPs and RFCs. ...years I was very active in the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) as a spec author, working group chair, member of the Internet Engineering Steering Gr
    2 KB (314 words) - 17:39, 5 October 2023
  • ...one of its founding developers. I've also contributed to a variety of XMPP specs, and am mentioned in the RFCs.
    728 bytes (115 words) - 14:23, 24 May 2022
  • RETIRED * Hardware specs: Dell Poweredge 1850(Dual P4 Hyperthreaded Xeon CPUs (2.8 Ghz), 4 GB mem, RETIRED * Hardware specs: Dell Poweredge 1850(Dual P4 Hyperthreaded Xeon CPUs (2.8 Ghz), 2 GB mem,
    3 KB (415 words) - 23:10, 4 June 2023
  • ...Technical Review Team is to continuously improve the technical quality of specifications produced by the XMPP Standards Foundation. === Spec Reviews ===
    3 KB (426 words) - 18:42, 14 September 2017
  • {{specs}}
    897 bytes (141 words) - 12:49, 23 April 2020
  • ...one of its founding developers. I've also contributed to a variety of XMPP specs, and am mentioned in the RFCs.
    732 bytes (120 words) - 14:35, 15 May 2020
  • * Justin to update the spec to reflect IRL discussion ...lements in message/presence (Justin to write first draft of best practices spec):
    5 KB (799 words) - 22:52, 27 January 2010
  • * Heavily advocates XMPP's use in games and is working on a spec for out-of-band server advertising based on pubsub and MUC For the Copyleft Games Group (which PySoy is part of), I'm working on a spec for out-of-band gaming via XMPP/Jingle. I want to leverage compatibility a
    2 KB (352 words) - 18:38, 21 April 2009
  • ...one of its founding developers. I've also contributed to a variety of XMPP specs, and am mentioned in the RFCs.
    825 bytes (140 words) - 06:37, 13 May 2019
  • {{specs}}
    993 bytes (156 words) - 20:39, 17 April 2020
  • ...cts on top of software which has real use and support in the community. We specialise in real-time communications, including IM, VOIP, video and collaborat ...dless of the underlying protocol, language or even license. As well as the spec itself, Collabora supports and develops the Jabber/XMPP backend as our main
    3 KB (461 words) - 13:41, 28 July 2010
  • ...cretary, Treasurer, Executive Director, etc. I also [co-]authored a lot of specs, both XEPs and RFCs. ...years I was very active in the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) as a spec author, working group chair, member of the Internet Engineering Steering Gr
    3 KB (471 words) - 01:26, 31 October 2022
  • ...ason to reapply for XSF membership. One of my main interests is making our specs more approachable to client (library) developers.
    1,022 bytes (152 words) - 16:50, 26 July 2021
  • ...one of its founding developers. I've also contributed to a variety of XMPP specs, and am mentioned in the RFCs.
    963 bytes (158 words) - 22:41, 21 May 2021
  • This event's goal is to produce tools (specs, implementations, etc.) for public XMPP services,
    1 KB (161 words) - 10:01, 11 April 2023
  • ...and howto documents, but since 2001 I've concentrated on writing protocol specs -- mostly [http://xmpp.org/extensions/ XEPs] and [http://xmpp.org/rfcs/ R
    1 KB (175 words) - 23:06, 27 January 2010
  • ...mostly focused on documenting existing protocols and writing new protocol specs. As a result I edited the XMPP RFCs and have also written dozens of XMPP E * Push more specs from Draft to Final (see [http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2007-
    3 KB (536 words) - 02:35, 17 December 2020
  • ...h with the standardization process. One of my main interests is making our specs more approachable to (future) client (library) developers.
    1 KB (180 words) - 20:36, 5 August 2023
  • would like to specifically address while on the council. I suspect the answer is some mix of modifying the name of the document statuses, cre
    6 KB (994 words) - 14:32, 5 November 2020
  • ...h with the standardization process. One of my main interests is making our specs more approachable to client (library) developers.
    1 KB (177 words) - 14:20, 27 July 2022
  • ** Idee: Es gibt nur eines Spec -> Interoperabilität ** Hat [https://matrix.org/docs/spec/proposals Spec-Proposal-Prozess]
    3 KB (421 words) - 14:16, 23 July 2020
  • I think that XMPP on the mobile, especially with project's like [https://github.com/rtreffer/AsmackService AsmackS ...ing on some of the social bits in XMPP. (Eventually I'd like to see a good spec for XMPP social, I just don't think we are there yet)
    1 KB (194 words) - 18:20, 28 February 2011
  • ...nes. Has some been Obsoleted, or simply Updated? Also learn about Friendly specs! focus on specs
    3 KB (463 words) - 19:07, 12 October 2019
  • ...be used for United Communications. I've provided feedback about the Jingle specs directly to Peter Saint-Andre instead of posting to the public discussion
    1 KB (227 words) - 21:09, 7 July 2008
  • * finding and fixing bugs thus improving compatibility with XMPP specs and general interoperability;
    1 KB (199 words) - 15:27, 22 March 2018
  • ...sode, I work on the M-Link XMPP server. Needless to say a lot of XMPP and spec reading are involved here :)
    1 KB (210 words) - 07:47, 8 October 2013
  • * both editing and writing specs * clarifying question: editorial or actually writing specs?
    5 KB (801 words) - 16:25, 3 January 2023
  • * finding and fixing bugs thus improving compatibility with XMPP specs and general interoperability;
    1 KB (216 words) - 17:26, 26 June 2017
  • * Clean up the publish-subscribe specifications (XEP-0060, XEP-0163, XEP-0248) * Advance the server dialback specification (XEP-0220) to Draft
    1 KB (192 words) - 18:49, 3 August 2012
  • ...al features of stable XEPs. This gives me a unique perspective on the XMPP specifications. There are also a fair number of specifications I'd like to see progress on. These include
    1 KB (229 words) - 23:24, 30 September 2010
  • * improving Tigase's compatibility with XMPP specs and general interoperability,
    2 KB (237 words) - 17:07, 4 April 2024
  • * improving Tigase's compatibility with XMPP specs and general interoperability,
    2 KB (237 words) - 12:16, 22 March 2023
  • ...al features of stable XEPs. This gives me a unique perspective on the XMPP specifications. I'm quite active on the standards mailing list. There are also a fair number of specifications I'd like to see progress on. These include
    1 KB (227 words) - 18:22, 11 October 2011
  • ...I work on the M-Link XMPP server team. Needless to say a lot of XMPP and spec reading (and suggesting cleanups in them) are involved here :)
    1 KB (258 words) - 11:00, 27 June 2014
  • * finding and fixing bugs thus improving compatibility with XMPP specs and general interoperability;
    2 KB (262 words) - 12:38, 28 March 2014
  • * finding and fixing bugs thus improving compatibility with XMPP specs and general interoperability,
    2 KB (257 words) - 12:18, 22 March 2019
  • * we are very good at specifications, but only by developers for developers, we don't ask enough our u ...good and best practices already available on the market, both in terms of specs and implems <= PUSH FOR IMPLEMENS OF NEW XEPs, COLLECT FEEDBACK
    2 KB (272 words) - 13:01, 6 November 2017
  • * [[Sprints/2020 March Duesseldorf|March 2020 Duesseldorf Spec Sprint]]
    1 KB (136 words) - 13:19, 26 February 2022
  • * [http://code.google.com/soc/inkscape/about.html Inkboard Protocol Spec and Lib Conversion]
    1 KB (201 words) - 20:03, 24 July 2010
  • * finding and fixing bugs thus improving compatibility with XMPP specs and general interoperability,
    2 KB (298 words) - 15:54, 3 April 2020
  • * finding and fixing bugs thus improving compatibility with XMPP specs and general interoperability;
    2 KB (301 words) - 08:44, 7 April 2015
  • * improving Tigase's compatibility with XMPP specs and general interoperability,
    2 KB (309 words) - 10:49, 12 April 2021
  • ...any of the clients, servers or libraries lacking support (see the project-specific lists below). ...xperience with this method so that we can correct and advance the relevant specs, which are:
    21 KB (3,274 words) - 01:05, 18 December 2020
  • ...od practices" to make things speak the same language. The interoperability spec will be a moving target with constant elaboration to enable true interopera ...nd doesn't cost a fortune to be compliant. And most importantly it is open specifications that is easy to find.
    2 KB (371 words) - 17:48, 1 November 2013
  • * improving Tigase's compatibility with XMPP specs and general interoperability,
    2 KB (350 words) - 11:04, 25 May 2022
  • * [http://code.google.com/soc/inkscape/about.html Inkboard Protocol Spec and Lib Conversion]
    2 KB (217 words) - 20:03, 24 July 2010
  • ! Client !! Described Version !! Jingle Audio Spec !! Transport Methods !! Audio Codecs || ICE implementation || STUN/TURN dis ...freedesktop.org/wiki/ libnice] || DNS (for STUN), Google Jingle Info, user specified || Yes (via libnice) || No
    2 KB (244 words) - 19:23, 5 August 2019
  • ...mostly focused on documenting existing protocols and writing new protocol specs. As a result I edited the XMPP RFCs and have also written dozens of JEPs.
    2 KB (318 words) - 02:37, 17 December 2020
  • ...SF discussions and other business, I have a few goals that I would like to specifically address while on the council: ...e the legacy [https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0136.html Message Archiving] spec (which I will revisit once MAM has been debated).
    2 KB (387 words) - 00:57, 28 October 2017
  • My passion is programming, and I am specializing in the topics of low-level hardware development and post-quantum cr I have largely contributed to the recent versions of the OMEMO XEP, especially the cryptographic details.
    2 KB (402 words) - 13:14, 14 February 2023
  • == XMPP Specifications == ...is my reason to apply for XSF membership. My main aim would be making our specs more approachable to client (library) developers.
    3 KB (413 words) - 10:47, 9 August 2020
  • ...e constructively to protocol (and other) discussions, my official protocol spec contributions are limited to the following XEPs:
    3 KB (418 words) - 18:09, 4 June 2014
  • ...e constructively to protocol (and other) discussions, my official protocol spec contributions are limited to the following XEPs:
    3 KB (418 words) - 17:50, 14 October 2013
  • ...e constructively to protocol (and other) discussions, my official protocol spec contributions are limited to the following XEPs:
    3 KB (418 words) - 15:55, 3 September 2012
  • ...e constructively to protocol (and other) discussions, my official protocol spec contributions are limited to the following XEPs:
    3 KB (418 words) - 18:19, 2 July 2011
  • ...e constructively to protocol (and other) discussions, my official protocol spec contributions are limited to the following XEPs:
    3 KB (419 words) - 20:24, 3 August 2010
  • ...e constructively to protocol (and other) discussions, my official protocol spec contributions are limited to the following XEPs:
    3 KB (421 words) - 08:51, 8 September 2009
  • * it needs to be specified more clearly: what is packet relay? * usage of relay on XMPP network is discouraged. right now the spec says you SHOULD allow relaying (since you MAY decide not to allow it). Let'
    3 KB (445 words) - 01:09, 18 December 2020
  • ...e constructively to protocol (and other) discussions, my official protocol spec contributions are limited to the following XEPs:
    3 KB (480 words) - 19:46, 24 July 2010
  • ...even needed - no real consensus as it may be too implementation enironment specific two aspects of conferencing
    12 KB (2,032 words) - 03:29, 2 March 2014
  • ...ther) discussions on the XMPP mailing lists. However, my official protocol spec contributions remain limited to the following XEPs:
    3 KB (527 words) - 19:47, 24 July 2010
  • === Specs === ...tations from Joe on some of the new XEP's he would like to see worked on (especially Carbons, XEP-0280) and then we had some demos of &yet's [http://otalk.
    3 KB (527 words) - 16:52, 26 December 2023
  • ..., multi-user chat (XEP-0045), publish-subscribe (XEP-0060), and the Jingle specs (XEPs 166, 167, 176, 234, etc.). In 2009 I co-authored "XMPP: The Definiti
    3 KB (488 words) - 23:43, 27 September 2015
  • == Base Specifications == This specification. Defines how provisioning, the management of
    4 KB (490 words) - 17:42, 13 April 2013
  • Some need specs, some need implementation/deployment. No specific conclusion/action.
    13 KB (2,032 words) - 01:14, 18 December 2020
  • ...gs communicate. In order to make it happen we must work for provide robust specs in area of rather new development: ...(we are working on and RSS/Atom mobile reader and we think that there few aspects that need standardization)
    4 KB (641 words) - 23:16, 27 January 2010
  • ...t, David Durand's Palimpsest model, some of the Tiny SVG spec and the XMPP specs. * Read documentation again, mainly other XEPs and a few old mailing lists, especially about writing the XEP.
    18 KB (2,927 words) - 01:01, 18 December 2020
  • ...e constructively to protocol (and other) discussions, my official protocol spec contributions are limited to the following XEPs:
    4 KB (696 words) - 19:49, 24 July 2010
  • ...he same DOM. Basic groups communication primitives are part of first level spec.
    4 KB (624 words) - 13:41, 28 July 2010
  • ...mmands in Mellium to draw forms. Also we'll discuss some problems with the spec and how they could be resolved.
    4 KB (603 words) - 20:34, 14 December 2021
  • == Base Specifications == This specification. Defines how provisioning, the management of
    5 KB (610 words) - 10:30, 13 June 2013
  • ...Peter, though). I've also been actively reviewing the 3920bis and 3921bis specs. I've been involved in the formation of a number of XEPs (and more are com * 198 is specced, and is starting to see use - we need to push for this.
    4 KB (763 words) - 12:56, 21 September 2010
  • This page lists known issues with the Publish-Subscribe specifications ([http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0060.html XEP-0060], [http://xmp * The section mentions that a '''body''' element can be provided and used to specify ''natural-language text regarding the affiliation change''.
    5 KB (692 words) - 09:32, 5 April 2015
  • ...he cold north]", with sauna and crêpes, working on new groupchat bookmarks specification, file transfer interoperability issues, and a future landing page === Extensions and specifications ===
    6 KB (729 words) - 08:16, 4 December 2019
  • * [[:Category:Spec Remarks|Remarks about XEPs and RFCs]]
    5 KB (745 words) - 19:36, 28 April 2024
  • ...eply within exam stuff and will remain so for several more weeks. Studying specifications of Encrypted sessions protocol, some of it's dependencies and of ...them and I found XMPP protocol even more capable and better than I first suspected. Well, XML namespace stuff is quite complicated (entire XML namespace mo
    5 KB (765 words) - 01:54, 17 December 2020
  • * got an open and open-minded community, can't believe it, even specs are free(speech)!
    5 KB (759 words) - 19:45, 24 July 2010
  • The second part is almost the opposite - in some respects, you can measure the worth of a Council member by how many times they're ...e knowledge the Council has. The last session had two server developers, a specification expert, a service developer, and a client developer. We had an exp
    5 KB (937 words) - 00:06, 28 January 2010
  • The spec is quite confusing either refering to XEP-0065's requester/target or Jingle If the XEP could provide a way to authenticates a specific candidate instead of the transport as a whole, that would make it possi
    6 KB (929 words) - 20:44, 17 April 2020
  • == Base Specifications == This specification. Defines how provisioning, the management of access privileges, et
    7 KB (923 words) - 21:40, 8 January 2014
  • * [[:Category:Spec Remarks|Remarks about XEPs and RFCs]]
    7 KB (917 words) - 01:50, 9 March 2021
  • ...ses, Whatsapp uses an XMPP-derivative protocol, Google Hangouts uses some aspects of XMPP internally, and as well as end-users it's used extensively by ent ...ate this use case. However, to get real life feedback and improve our XMPP specifications, we need to experiment with working code. A consistent package of
    32 KB (4,792 words) - 09:37, 23 June 2017
  • ...ike clients, servers, libraries, but also hosted/running services (because specifications don't have to be widely covered since we have one central origin: ...lish very early proof-of-concepts, this can clearly lead to new and better specs and codebases
    7 KB (1,124 words) - 09:05, 28 September 2010
  • ...r the organizers nor other participants will tell you to work on something specific. ...t X, or want to implement a certain feature in your client and know that a specific developer knows a thing or two about that, you can look in the particip
    7 KB (1,219 words) - 18:57, 24 April 2024
  • ...t almost inevitably, I've moved to being much more reactive - dealing with specifications as they arrive, and trying to seek out problems and issues in the The vote tallies don't really show it, but I suspect I've voted against more XEPs than any other member - I'd like to think thi
    7 KB (1,214 words) - 21:46, 2 September 2008
  • * Migration is done through presence stanzas, so only online clients get the specific payload, other get a roster push * Daniel volunteers to specify the tombstoning for IBR
    6 KB (949 words) - 00:08, 30 March 2019
  • ...ts of channels and quickly reynchronise messages when coming back online (especially nice in a mobile environment). This project is to build a gateway so t ** Understanding of XMPP messaging, MAM, PubSub and MUC specs
    8 KB (1,124 words) - 09:34, 23 June 2017
  • * Spec bugs: ==== Request specific identity ====
    11 KB (1,287 words) - 10:26, 8 October 2019
  • ...ntation on XMPP, SASL or DIGEST-MD5. If you're in doubt, read the relevant specs. This document assumes that you'll never want to use the channel integrity ...pt to authenticate into. If not present, the client should ask the user to specify a realm.
    10 KB (1,538 words) - 11:05, 1 January 2019
  • Usual way to prevent them from spamming was to inspect messages (e.g. links, message too large etc.). ...of checking message contents, we checked whether messages conformed to the spec, for example some messages had typing errors, or MUC messages were sent to
    9 KB (1,513 words) - 21:29, 3 February 2018
  • ...ns should we rather not depend on it? Yes we should put new rules in a new spec.... ...that are mandatory for government bodies to adhere to when they want to do specific things.
    15 KB (1,466 words) - 22:33, 19 February 2020
  • ### Specification Spec a component (or SIMS?) To expose rich HTTP links to clients (Link Purple, p
    20 KB (2,799 words) - 14:47, 29 November 2018
  • ...itecture and a timeline. Rene will also be available for client and server specific code questions. Additionally there is an active buddycloud dev chat-roo ...her applications to enable searching and notifications based on content or specific changes to that content.
    18 KB (2,799 words) - 09:26, 23 June 2017
  • ...rd to the mechanisms the involved protocols provide. From a pure "what the specification describes" pont-of-view, an ideal solution would possibly be to ...ultimately, the entity possibly also wants to verify if setting has been respected and became effective.
    20 KB (3,520 words) - 10:16, 28 May 2022
  • ...port is a big project, it probably makes more sense to develop a specific aspect of Jingle support, such as the file transfer content type or a particular ...0136]. A SoC project could add support for message archiving to a client (especially a web client) or a server.
    24 KB (3,735 words) - 02:34, 17 December 2020
  • * '''Summary''': Implement all aspects of keeping conversation history, both local and remote. * '''Summary''': Implement social aspects in user profiles
    35 KB (5,336 words) - 09:31, 23 June 2017