16
edits
Difference between revisions of "Tech pages/IoT Interoperability"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tech pages/IoT Interoperability (view source)
Revision as of 13:40, 19 June 2013
, 13:40, 19 June 2013no edit summary
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Some examples of interoperability | Some examples of interoperability | ||
The problem is that to finance these organizations they must take a member fee and the certification processes is very costly for companies. This also implies that they need to be more or less closed (you have t | The problem is that to finance these organizations they must take a member fee and the certification processes is very costly for companies. This also implies that they need to be more or less closed (you have t | ||
| Line 39: | Line 37: | ||
== Automatic test bed == | == Automatic test bed == | ||
To be interoperable and to verify functions testing is | To be interoperable and to verify functions testing is crucial therefore we intend to setup an interoperable testbed with a interoperable bot that you can connect to and run an interoperable test. | ||
== Other examples == | == Other examples == | ||
In all technical protocols there are interoperability efforts unfortunately they often are to close to the physical protocol they are working with | |||
* [http://zigbee.org/ ZigBee alliance] Defining all layers of the OSI stack for wireless sensor networks and adding "profiles" for smart energy | |||
* [http://upnp.org Upnp Forum] | |||
* [http://upnp.org dlna working group] Specifications for printers, Tv sets to be interoperable | |||
* LonMark an initiative to standardize equipment connected to the lonworks communication system | |||
* BacNet | |||
* The Zigbee smart energy 3.0 and ZigBee IP this is one of the closest to actually leave the physical layer | |||
* The Zigbee smart energy | |||