Difference between revisions of "Tech pages/IoT Interoperability"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= Layout=
= Layout =
  [[Tech pages/IoT_systems|Main]] Main page
 
  [[Tech pages/IoT_XepsExplained|IoT_XepsExplained]] Description of xeps and their interaction
{{XmppIoTLayout}}
  [[Tech pages/IoT_Examples|IoT_Examples]] Mashup some examples from different industries, help finding new ones
  [[Tech pages/IoT_Support|IoT_Support]] Here we describe who support this and related work that can help you.
  [[Tech pages/IoT_Interoperability|IoT_Interoperability]] How we will keep everything truly interoperable
  [[Tech pages/IoT_XMPP_Process|IoT_XMPP_Process]] How is the process of the xep's and interoperability interfaces managed
  [[Tech pages/IoT_ConstrainedDevices|IoT_ConstrainedDevices]] Going in to the world of restricted devices we need special care.


== Overview ==
== Overview ==
Line 13: Line 8:
Some examples of interoperability  
Some examples of interoperability  


* ZigBee alliance, Defining all layers of the OSI stack for wireless sensor networks and adding "profiles" for smart energy
 
* Upnp and dlna working with specifications for printers, Tv sets to be interoperable 
* LonMark an initiative to standardize equipment connected to the lonworks communication system


The problem is that to finance these organizations they must take a member fee and the certification processes is very costly for companies. This also implies that they need to be more or less closed (you have t
The problem is that to finance these organizations they must take a member fee and the certification processes is very costly for companies. This also implies that they need to be more or less closed (you have t
Line 39: Line 32:
== Automatic test bed ==
== Automatic test bed ==


To be interoperable and to verify functions testing is cru
To be interoperable and to verify functions testing is crucial therefore we intend to setup an interoperable testbed with a interoperable bot that you can connect to and run an interoperable test.


== Other examples ==
== Other examples ==
In all technical protocols there are interoperability efforts unfortunately they often are to close to the physical protocol they are working with
* [http://zigbee.org/ ZigBee alliance] Defining all layers of the OSI stack for wireless sensor networks and adding "profiles" for smart energy
* [http://upnp.org Upnp Forum]
* [http://upnp.org dlna working group] Specifications for printers, Tv sets to be interoperable 
* LonMark an initiative to standardize equipment connected to the lonworks communication system
* BacNet


* Lonworks and the lonmark organisation
* The Zigbee smart energy 3.0 and ZigBee IP this is one of the closest to actually leave the physical layer
* The Zigbee smart energy 2.0 and ZigBee IP
*
15

edits

Navigation menu