Difference between revisions of "Peter Saint-Andre for Council 2007"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
== Seventh Council Priorities ==
== Seventh Council Priorities ==


In last year's Council elections, I claimed that during the Sixth Council we could stabilize pubsub/PEP, make good progress on end-to-end encryption, complete revisions to the XMPP RFCs at the IETF, advance more XEPs from Draft to Final (e.g., JEP-0045 and JEP-0060), and deprecate XEPs that people are not using (e.g., JEP-0013). It didn't quite work out that way.
In last year's Council elections, I claimed that during the Sixth Council we could stabilize [http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0060.html pubsub] and [http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0163.html PEP], make good progress on [http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0116.html end-to-end encryption] ("e2e"), complete revisions to the XMPP RFCs at the IETF, advance more XEPs from Draft to Final (e.g., [http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0060.html XEP-0045] and [http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0060.html XEP-0060]), and deprecate XEPs that people are not using (e.g., [http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0013.html XEP-0013]). Unfortunately, it didn't quite [http://www.xmpp.org/council/tallies_06.shtml work out that way]. We made some good progress on e2e but have spent more time than we really wanted to cleaning up [http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0060.html pubsub] and [http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0115.html entity capabilities], as well as proposed modifications to the XMPP RFCs. Work on these core protocols has kept us from making more progress on more advanced features.


== Why I'm Running Again ==
== Why I'm Running Again ==
80

edits

Navigation menu