Difference between revisions of "XEP-Remarks/XEP-0050:Ad-Hoc Commands"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Add Category
(Add Category)
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:


Original standards@ post: https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2015-August/030137.html
Original standards@ post: https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2015-August/030137.html
=== Contradiction ===


Part of this confusion is that XEP-0050 makes multiple statements about execute (both the attribute and the action):
Part of this confusion is that XEP-0050 makes multiple statements about execute (both the attribute and the action):


In 2.4.2: "The "execute" attribute defines which of the included actions is considered the equivalent to "execute" for this stage."
In 2.4.2: "The "execute" attribute defines which of the included actions is considered the equivalent to "execute" for this stage."
In 3.4: "If the <actions/> possesses the "execute" attribute, that value is the default button or option. If the <actions/> does not possess the "execute" attribute, there is no default button or option."
In 3.4: "If the <actions/> possesses the "execute" attribute, that value is the default button or option. If the <actions/> does not possess the "execute" attribute, there is no default button or option."
and "The "execute" attribute SHOULD NOT specify a value that does not match one of the allowed actions."
and "The "execute" attribute SHOULD NOT specify a value that does not match one of the allowed actions."
Line 28: Line 31:


In 4.2: "The "execute" attribute specifies what the action "execute" is equivalent to."
In 4.2: "The "execute" attribute specifies what the action "execute" is equivalent to."
Clearly the statements "The "execute" attribute specifies what the action "execute" is equivalent to." (in 4.2) and "The action "execute" is always allowed, and is equivalent to the action "next"." (in 3.4) contradict each other.


There are currently at least two PR which try to improve the situation, an overview is given in https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/591#issuecomment-373313491
There are currently at least two PR which try to improve the situation, an overview is given in https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/591#issuecomment-373313491
[[Category:Spec_Remarks]]
416

edits

Navigation menu