121
edits
Difference between revisions of "Stanza encryption"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Proposal / Work in Progress
Vanitasvitae (talk | contribs) |
Vanitasvitae (talk | contribs) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Most importantly though we need experience in this field in order to get a better understanding of what pitfalls exist, so lets JUST DO IT! | Most importantly though we need experience in this field in order to get a better understanding of what pitfalls exist, so lets JUST DO IT! | ||
== | == Use Cases == | ||
* | * Clients exchange messages that contain sensitive information with (multiple) other clients. | ||
* Clients might want to encrypt IQs between two (online) devices. Since there may be more than one consecutive IQ being exchanged within the same context, it might be worth to think about possibilities to establish some sort of longer standing session to reduce encryption overhead. This may be out of the scope of this document though. | |||
== Related Work == | == Related Work == | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
* [https://op-co.de/tmp/SEX.html Simple Encryption for XMPP] | * [https://op-co.de/tmp/SEX.html Simple Encryption for XMPP] | ||
== Proposal == | == Proposal / Work in Progress == | ||
The proposal is actively worked on [https://github.com/vanitasvitae/flowdalic-xeps/tree/sce here]. See /xep-sce/ for the document ([http://geekplace.eu/xeps/xep-sce/xep-sce.html rendered html]). | |||
Please feel free to comment, give feedback and request changes! | |||