Difference between revisions of "Organization Proposal"
(stub) |
|||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Perhaps we can be more actively involved with European initiatives (e.g., EU policy-making) without actually moving the XSF or creating a subsidiary or "local office". This should be explored, too. | Perhaps we can be more actively involved with European initiatives (e.g., EU policy-making) without actually moving the XSF or creating a subsidiary or "local office". This should be explored, too. | ||
= Factors to Consider = | |||
Here are some things we should think about... | |||
== Personnel == | |||
* Who will do the work in Europe? | |||
* Who cannot do the work (e.g., can only citizens of the domicile country be board members)? | |||
* What about succession planning? | |||
== Assets == | |||
This might include: | |||
* The membership roster | |||
* The foundation's name | |||
* Copyright in XEPs | |||
* Domain name(s) | |||
* Money in the bank | |||
* Anything else that can be considered valuable |
Revision as of 16:24, 21 June 2024
Overview
In early 2024, XSF Board member Nicola Fabiano proposed that we consider strengthening the XSF's presence in Europe. This could take several forms:
- Move the XSF entirely to Europe
- Create a subsidiary in Europe
- Make no organizational changes (this is always an option!)
These options are explained in more detail below.
Rationale
The basic idea is that most of the XSF's activities (e.g., FOSDEM, Summit, sprints) take place in Europe, and most developers in the XMPP community are located in Europe. Furthermore, it might be easier to obtain grants from European organizations if the XSF had a stronger European presence. Finally, we might be able to have more influence over European policy (e.g., DMA and the EU Chat Control proposals) if our organization were domiciled in Europe.
Options
Move
In order to move the XSF from the U.S. to a European country, we would probably need to form a separate organization in Europe and then shut down the XSF.
Subsidiary
Creating a subsidiary might be more complicated in the end, because we would need people on both continents to manage official matters such as banking, taxes, accounting, legal, and various government interactions. It's unclear if the benefits outweigh the costs.
Do Nothing
Perhaps we can be more actively involved with European initiatives (e.g., EU policy-making) without actually moving the XSF or creating a subsidiary or "local office". This should be explored, too.
Factors to Consider
Here are some things we should think about...
Personnel
- Who will do the work in Europe?
- Who cannot do the work (e.g., can only citizens of the domicile country be board members)?
- What about succession planning?
Assets
This might include:
- The membership roster
- The foundation's name
- Copyright in XEPs
- Domain name(s)
- Money in the bank
- Anything else that can be considered valuable