Difference between revisions of "Board-Meeting-2022-12-14"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
==Date of Next Meeting== | ==Date of Next Meeting== | ||
Thursday, January | Thursday, January 5 @ 17:00 UTC | ||
==Action Items== | ==Action Items== | ||
Line 166: | Line 166: | ||
* Ralph is working on the location for the Summit | * Ralph is working on the location for the Summit | ||
== | == Process Check == | ||
* Video conferencing vs. text chat | |||
* Jitsi seemed OK, maybe not use it all the time | * Jitsi seemed OK, maybe not use it all the time |
Latest revision as of 16:25, 3 January 2023
Coordinates
- Date: Wednesday, 2022-12-14
- Time: 16:00-16:30 UTC
- Video conference at https://meet.jit.si/XSF-Board-2022-12-14 (no account needed, simply visit that URL)
Agenda
Call to Order / Quorum
Returning Business
New Business
Selection of Chair
Editor Role, Processes, and Tooling
Confirmation of Officers
As noted at https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Board we need to verify that non-Board officers wish to continue serving in their roles. NOTE: This has been done via email.
Other Priorities for this Term
- Do we want to poll the members as we did some years ago?
emus: Yes, that was one plan by me too for this year. Do we got the old draft?
FOSDEM
GSOC
emus wants to apply as Org Admin again
AOB
Date of Next Meeting
Thursday, January 5 @ 17:00 UTC
Action Items
Meeting Notes
Quorum
- Present: Eddie, Matthew, Peter, Ralph, Arc
- Guests: MSavoritas, Jonas, Kev, Daniel, Zash, perhaps a few others
Chair Selection
- Ralph
Editor, Processes, Tooling
Eddie:
- a few folks (Jonas, Guus, Georg, etc.) created issues at the GitHub repo
- see https://github.com/xsf/xeps/issues
- would the XSF be willing to fund some of the work?
- could we raise some funds to support the work? (e.g., via OpenCollective)
- there seems to willingness to fund XMPP software projects, might be for standards as well
- this is core work of the XSF
- this situation could be not only a risk but an opportunity
Matthew:
- I have thoughts on the role in general
- as to the current situation, we won't have time to modify processes etc.
- need to find someone to fill in now
- if we are going to put more resources in, make it less robotic and more editorial
- both editing and writing specs
Ralph:
- clarifying question: editorial or actually writing specs?
Matthew:
- don't think it's necessary for someone to do both
- but if we can automate more of the button-clicking, that person could have more of an editorial role
- there has been initial work on tooling
- I've done a few things to run scripts on PRs and such
- some kind of CI framework to have a PR, run builds, etc.
- still need to add glue for CI workflow
- Guus submitted a PR for linting (now merged)
- I understand the idea of hiring someone but it's more about how than who
- I don't feel comfortable just posting to a freelance site to find someone
- we need someone who understands the standards process, our community, etc.
- I suspect we have lots of volunteers, who don't necessarily need money but direction
Eddie:
- we've had a few people offer to assist
- agree that we don't necessarily need to pay people
Ralph:
- when people stop doing stuff, then someone will eventually step up
- I don't know what the implications would be of hiring someone
Kev:
- if someone wants to throw money around, that's grand
- but it should happen fairly
- needs to be a process for choosing someone
- let's also get clear on what we need for tooling
- what would make life easy for
MSavoritias:
- I don't have a problem being someone who works on tooling
- I have some time to help out with pipelines etc.
- the reason I haven't done that much is that I don't have GitHub
Peter:
- we do have $16k in the bank and can spend if needed
- if we are going to pay people, there could be implications and we'd need to investigate
- I would be happy to do a bunch of the bit-flipping for now
- if we look at how things like Rust does RFCs and Python does PEPs,
Ralph:
- we won't be able to make a decision today but let's be active in figuring this out
Jonas:
- there are things we can do that could be spread around a team
- I'm happy to provide input beyond what is in the issues
- but what's in the issues would solve a large percentage of the problems
- the mechanical bits make it unpleasant
- I'd be happy to assist
Ralph:
- what I'm looking for now is that we need to organize this effort
Peter:
- we have volunteers but someone needs to
Matthew:
- I'm happy to help with technical leadership but I don't want to do all the work
- we need: (1) an acting editor (2) people to write the tooling
- I think we have those
Kev:
- it would help to understand what exactly the process is that Jonas follows now
Peter:
- Jonas, I will coordinate with you about that
Confirmation of Officers
- Matthew Wild as Executive Director
- Peter Saint-Andre as Treasurer
- Alex Gnauck as Secretary (need to double-check via email)
Google Summer of Code
- Eddie offered to be the Org Admin
FOSDEM
- no board involvement needed right now
- Ralph is working on the location for the Summit
Process Check
- Video conferencing vs. text chat
- Jitsi seemed OK, maybe not use it all the time