Difference between revisions of "Roundup/Specifications"

From XMPP WIKI
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(credits)
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== XMPP Roundup 13: Specifications ==
== XMPP Roundup 13: Specifications ==


Welcome to the Specification part of the XMPP Roundup #13, your irregular news from the XMPP community. There has been a long time since we have not reported about specifications moves. Here is a short summary of what happened since September.
Welcome to the Specification part of the XMPP Roundup #13, your irregular news from the XMPP community. It has been a long time since we have reported on specifications changes. Here is a short summary of what happened since September.


This edition has been brought to you by Johann, Kevin, and Nicolas.
This edition has been brought to you by Johann, Kevin, Will, Guillaume, Peter, and Nicolas.




Line 25: Line 25:
'''Proposed XEPs'''
'''Proposed XEPs'''


This XEP ha been proposed for standardization:
This XEP has been proposed for standardization:
* [http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/jingle-nodes.html XEP-xxxx: Jingle Relay Nodes]
* [http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/jingle-nodes.html XEP-xxxx: Jingle Relay Nodes]


Line 46: Line 46:
'''Draft'''
'''Draft'''


This XEP has been accepted as a 'darft':
This XEP has been accepted as a 'draft':
* [http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0270.html XEP-0270: XMPP Compliance Suites 2010]
* [http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0270.html XEP-0270: XMPP Compliance Suites 2010]


Line 90: Line 90:




This is it. This Roundup is over. Please feel free to contribute news items from your XMPP-related projects, code and specs, so that we can cover these on this blog.
That's it. This Roundup is over. Please feel free to contribute news items from your XMPP-related projects, code and specs, so that we can cover these on this blog.


If your are specially interested in XEPs, you can join the [http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Standards mailing-list] or just read the [http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/ archives].
If your are specially interested in XEPs, you can join the [http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Standards mailing-list] or just read the [http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/ archives].

Revision as of 16:08, 22 February 2010

XMPP Roundup 13: Specifications

Welcome to the Specification part of the XMPP Roundup #13, your irregular news from the XMPP community. It has been a long time since we have reported on specifications changes. Here is a short summary of what happened since September.

This edition has been brought to you by Johann, Kevin, Will, Guillaume, Peter, and Nicolas.


Linked Process

Linked Process, mentioned in the last XMPP Roundup, has got a new protoXEP.

All the XEPs in PDF

Tobias Markmann wrote a XEP publishing mechanism that generates the XEPs in PDF format, with syntax highlighting for example stanzas. You can now download each one of them, read them while offline, and distribute them to you customers, partners, and best friends. You can also get the full pack as a tarball: xepbundle.tar.bz2. Tobias also added checkboxes that enable the filtering based on the XEP status.

XEP version comparison

Tobias and Waqas Hussain have also been working on a tool to compare XEP versions that recently went live. Thank you very much Tobias and Waqas!

Review team at work: Multi-User Chat

The freshly created Review Team is working heavily on the venerable XEP-0045.


Proposed XEPs

This XEP has been proposed for standardization:


New XEPs

These are the new XEPs accepted as 'experimental' by the Council:


Last call

These XEPs are in last call before going to a 'draft' status:


Draft

This XEP has been accepted as a 'draft':


Updated

Updates have been committed to the following XEPs:


Deferred specs

These XEP have been deferred, since they have not been touched for a long time:


That's it. This Roundup is over. Please feel free to contribute news items from your XMPP-related projects, code and specs, so that we can cover these on this blog.

If your are specially interested in XEPs, you can join the Standards mailing-list or just read the archives.