Difference between revisions of "Provider Recommendations"

From XMPP WIKI
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Update conversations.im entry: The service is free, now.)
(Add XMPP Providers entry and archive old setup)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Criteria ==
Instead of listing an unmaintained list the XMPP Provider project will be suggested. Most of the criteria below are covered in a more professional way incl. references for each parameter.


''Criteria should be independently verifiable. For example stats (compliancy, up time, TLS) should be generated with open source tools and the results should be linked from the list. Things like Privacy policy should be linked from the list as well.''
* [Project https://providers.xmpp.net/]
* [Tablular view https://providers.xmpp.net/overview/]
 
 
<div class="mw-customtoggle-myDivision" style="background:#e0e8ff">Expand archive of old provider recommendations</div>
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-myDivision">
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible-content">
 
=== Criteria ===
 
''Criteria should be independently verifiable. For example stats (compliance, up time, TLS) should be generated with open source tools and the results should be linked from the list. Things like Privacy policy should be linked from the list as well.''


* Passes the [https://compliance.conversations.im/ Conversations Compliance Test]
* Passes the [https://compliance.conversations.im/ Conversations Compliance Test]
Line 18: Line 28:
* Proper backup
* Proper backup
* No extremely restrictive anti spam policies like allowing only messages from people in your contact list
* No extremely restrictive anti spam policies like allowing only messages from people in your contact list
</div>
</div>


== List of providers ==
== List of providers ==

Revision as of 18:44, 7 September 2022

Instead of listing an unmaintained list the XMPP Provider project will be suggested. Most of the criteria below are covered in a more professional way incl. references for each parameter.


Expand archive of old provider recommendations

Criteria

Criteria should be independently verifiable. For example stats (compliance, up time, TLS) should be generated with open source tools and the results should be linked from the list. Things like Privacy policy should be linked from the list as well.

  • Passes the Conversations Compliance Test
  • Provides IBR (redirect to website is OK)
  • Up-time of >=99.5% in the last 30 days. (On XMPP level (successful login) not just TCP). For example measured via status.conversations.im.
  • Grade A (no self signed certificate, no insecure TLS settings) on xmpp.net
  • Provides a privacy policy (link)

Additional Criteria

Criteria that are generally nice to have but are we are unsure on how to verify them. (Suggestions welcome)

  • Complies with GDPR
  • Has a bus factor > 1
  • Proper monitoring
  • Proper backup
  • No extremely restrictive anti spam policies like allowing only messages from people in your contact list

List of providers

Provider Server(s) location (and providers) Up time (30 day average) Compliance TLS Privacy Policy Fee
Anoxinon Messenger Germany (https://www.hetzner.com) - 19/19 Grade A https://anoxinon.de/datenschutzerklaerung_xmpp/ Free
blabber.im - - 19/19 Grade A https://blabber.im/en/datenschutz/ Free
conversations.im Germany (Manitu) 99.52% 19/19 Grade A https://account.conversations.im/privacy/ Free
dismail.de - 100.0% 19/19 Grade A https://dismail.de/datenschutz.html free
jabberfr.org France (online.net) 99.72% 19/19 Grade A https://wiki.jabberfr.org/CGU Free
magicbroccoli.de - 99.66% 19/19 Grade A https://magicbroccoli.de/datenschutz/ Free
tigase.im USA (AWS) - 18/19 Grade A https://tigase.im/privacy.txt Free
trashserver.net - 99.92% 19/19 Grade A https://trashserver.net/en/privacy/ Donation