175
edits
Difference between revisions of "Daniel Gultsch for Council 2019"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Daniel Gultsch for Council 2019 (view source)
Revision as of 07:53, 15 September 2019
, 07:53, 15 September 2019→Moving XEPs to Draft
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
There is a chance that one or even all of the XEPs I used as examples above are not the most beautiful things the XMPP has ever come up with. But that doesn’t change the fact that these XEPs are different to the average lower quality experimental stage XEPs. The life cycle state of those XEP has to reflect that. | There is a chance that one or even all of the XEPs I used as examples above are not the most beautiful things the XMPP has ever come up with. But that doesn’t change the fact that these XEPs are different to the average lower quality experimental stage XEPs. The life cycle state of those XEP has to reflect that. | ||
If we promote those widely used but arguably not 100% perfect XEPs to ''draft'' now and come up with a better solution later we can still ''obsolete'' them. | |||
It is irritating that our Compliance Suits which are basically lists of XEPs to implement for a good & modern IM experience point to XEPs that then say »Please don’t implement me in production«. | It is irritating that our Compliance Suits which are basically lists of XEPs to implement for a good & modern IM experience point to XEPs that then say »Please don’t implement me in production«. | ||