Difference between revisions of "Client Test Cases"

Line 29:

# MAM impersonation: a <message> from a remote JID containing a <result> with a wrapped <message>

# Impersonation via XEP-0297 Stanza Forwarding:

Similar to the MAM impersonation but with a top-level <forward> element.

Clients are supposed to clearly indicate that a message has been forwarded.

Misbehaving clients might instead show the forwarded message as if it came from that person.

There's also zero guarantee that a forwarded message is not in fact a forgery.

= Multi User Chats =

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 # MAM impersonation: a <message> from a remote JID containing a <result> with a wrapped <message>
 # Impersonation via XEP-0297 Stanza Forwarding:
-    Similar to the MAM impersonation but with a top-level <forward> element.
+Similar to the MAM impersonation but with a top-level <forward> element.
-    Clients are supposed to clearly indicate that a message has been forwarded.
+Clients are supposed to clearly indicate that a message has been forwarded.
-    Misbehaving clients might instead show the forwarded message as if it came from that person.
+Misbehaving clients might instead show the forwarded message as if it came from that person.
-    There's also zero guarantee that a forwarded message is not in fact a forgery.
+There's also zero guarantee that a forwarded message is not in fact a forgery.
 = Multi User Chats =

Navigation menu