Difference between revisions of "Peter Saint-Andre for Council 2006"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== History ==
== History ==


I've been involved with the Jabber community since late 1999. I've been the [http://www.jabber.org/jeps/editor.shtml JEP Editor] since the JSF was founded in 2001 and the JSF's Executive Director since 2002.  
I've been involved with the Jabber community since late 1999. I've been the [http://www.jabber.org/jeps/editor.shtml JEP Editor] since the JSF was founded in 2001, the JSF's Executive Director since 2002, and Chair of the Jabber Council for 2004-2005 and 2005-2006.


== Contributions ==
== Contributions ==
Line 9: Line 9:
== Sixth Council Priorities ==
== Sixth Council Priorities ==


To follow.
I think the Fifth Council (2005-2006) did a pretty good job. We didn't publish a lot of new protocols, but that's not necessarily a bad thing given the traditional cry of "too many JEPs". We still haven't replaced vcard-temp or finalized a protocol for end-to-end encryption (as described in my [http://wiki.jabber.org/index.php/Peter_Saint_Andre_for_Council_2005#Fifth_Council_Priorities 2005 priorities] but I think we're getting closer with our work on PEP. I'm confident we can finish many PEP payload formats this year, make good progress on the end-to-end encryption technology (JEP-0116), complete revisions to the XMPP RFCs at the IETF, and advance more JEPs from Draft to Final (e.g., JEP-0045 and JEP-0060). These efforts will provide strong foundations for further work. Also  I would like to deprecate JEPs that people are not using (e.g., JEP-0013).


== Why I'm Running Again ==
== Why I'm Running Again ==


It's important that the Council stay productive. That doesn't necessarily mean publishing a lot of JEPs -- code is more important than protocol -- but it does mean publishing the right JEPs and trying to push them through the JSF standards process as quickly as we can. I'm running for Council again because I think I've done a good job of pushing the Council in 2004-2005, and I can do that again for 2005-2006.
Once again I think it's important for the Council to publish and advance the right JEPs, not necessarily more JEPs. I'm running for Council again because I think I've done a good job of pushing the Council in 2004-2005 and 2005-2006, and I think I can do that again for 2006-2007.
80

edits

Navigation menu