Difference between revisions of "Daniel Gultsch for Council 2019"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
/
(/)
Line 27: Line 27:
If we are going to consider ''experimental'' as a lower quality just-provide-a-stable-base kind of stage (see previous section) we need to move those XEPs that are widely implemented (and are obviously working for a lot of people) on to draft to make them distinguishable from XEPs that are not fit for use.
If we are going to consider ''experimental'' as a lower quality just-provide-a-stable-base kind of stage (see previous section) we need to move those XEPs that are widely implemented (and are obviously working for a lot of people) on to draft to make them distinguishable from XEPs that are not fit for use.


There is a chance that one or even all of the XEPs I used as examples above are not the most beautiful things the XMPP has over come up with. But that doesn’t change the fact that these XEPs are different to the average lower quality experimental stage XEPs. The life cycle state of those XEP has to reflect that.
There is a chance that one or even all of the XEPs I used as examples above are not the most beautiful things the XMPP has ever come up with. But that doesn’t change the fact that these XEPs are different to the average lower quality experimental stage XEPs. The life cycle state of those XEP has to reflect that.
 
It is irritating that our Compliance Suits which are basically lists of XEPs to implement for a good & modern IM experience point to XEPs that then say »Please don’t implement me in production«.
175

edits

Navigation menu