XMPP IM Client Design Guidelines

= Introduction =

These Guidelines provide some advices and recommendations to XMPP IM Client developers about how to use XMPP for Instant Messaging purposes. This document was created collaboratively by the XMPP community, it is not a official publication of the XMPP Standards Foundation (XSF), nor are developers required to follow the recommendations.

= Advices And Recommendations =

Description
XMPP Clients should only ask the user for his JID and password. A proper XMPP setup does not require more information in order for the client to establish a successful connection to the server. There should be a single JID text field in which the user is expected to enter his bare JID. Visual feedback once it was detected that a valid bare JID was entered, e.g. a green check mark or changing the field's background color (from red) to green, is also a good idea.

Rationale
Splitting the JID into multiple input fields makes it impossible for the user to simply copy&paste his JID into the field. Asking the user for more then his bare JID and password increases the UI elements and reduces the usability.

Description
Instead of letting the user specify a resource or providing a pre-configured list of possible resource names (e.g. '/home', '/work', '/notebook') let the server generate a resource for your client (RFC 6120 7.6). Servers are required to support this. You may optionally provide a possibility to configure the resource to the user under a "advanced settings" menu (or similar). But a XMPP user should not need to configure or specify a resource.

Store the resource you obtained from the server on the first connection, and re-use that on later connections. That way, a properly-configured server will close your old session if it still was deemed active by it.

Rationale
Resource names should not be guessable to prevent presence leaks (RFC 6120 13.10.2).

Providing a default resource also prevents the user from using the same software from two different locations at the same time.

Description
Users want to know the type of a remote resource, e.g. "Is this the resource of my friends mobile device or of his desktop?". Clients should display the type using the 'identity' information provided by XEP-30 disco#info query results. Also they should set a meaningful XEP-30 'identity'. So instead of having a resource like '/work-pc', the client should return

      

within the 'disco#info' results.

Rationale
Encoding semantics in the value of the resource is not recommend (see previous item).

Description
Do not:
 * Add new attributes on the,   or   elements.
 * Create new  values for stanzas.
 * Create new top-level elements.
 * Put your custom data in the  of a.
 * Invent new values for the  element in   stanzas (allowed values are listed in RFC 6121 section 4.7.2.1)

Do:

Add a new XML element in your own namespace:

 ,  or   elements may be stripped by servers if they do not understand it, or the server may completely refuse to handle the packet. Any XML element inside the stanza will be passed along to the recipient unchanged. This will also make it easier for other XMPP libraries to work with your data.

Description
Do not: Implement DIGEST-MD5 or CRAM-MD5. These mechanisms only work if the server has access to the plain password.

Do: Implement SCRAM-SHA-1 and PLAIN.

Rationale
Hashing and salting passwords helps making it hard to retrieve the plain password from a compromised server. However, we would also like to be able to protect the password while it is in transit. These two concepts are difficult to combine: DIGEST-MD5 and CRAM-MD5 only protect the password in transit – the mechanisms can't work if the server wants to store the password hashed and salted. SCRAM-SHA-1 fixes that and supports both hashed storage and hashed transmission.

While it would be nice to deprecate PLAIN, it is still needed for servers who use a different hashing mechanism than SCRAM-SHA-1 needs.

See SASLandSCRAM-SHA-1 for help with implementing SCRAM-SHA-1.